Parents Oppose Facial Recognition in U.S. Schools Because China and Russia Use It To Spy on Dissidents

Parents Oppose Facial Recognition in U.S. Schools Because China and Russia Use It To Spy on Dissidents  for Activist Post

Before facial recognition technology was invented, schools hired security guards to protect students and staff from “the bad guys.”  If you’ve had the opportunity to watch PBS Frontline Film, China Undercover or read the New Yorker article, The Terrifying Potential of 5G” (see 1, 2) – you may better understand these parents’ concerns about facial recognition technology.

What’s also concerning – no matter how much these schools promise that students are not the subject of data collection – there are too many reports of hackers finding a way to break into all kinds of businesses, home devices, medical implants, security systems, etc. and do and take whatever they want (see 1, 2, 3, 4).

From Full Measure:

In the ongoing mission to make our schools as safe as possible, some officials are turning to advanced technology like facial recognition. But that’s sparking concerns about privacy. Joce Sterman takes us to one of the first schools to deploy the technology.

Joce: It might sound like primetime drama, but facial recognition is real. Artificial intelligence can map out unique features of your face and memorize what you look like, making you identifiable anywhere, any time.

But is facial recognition an overbearing big brother or a guardian superhero? That depends on who you ask.

This year, that debate entered a new realm: a quiet school district in upstate New York.

(video shows school building)

This is Lockport, 30 miles outside of Buffalo, New York. In the dead of winter, the school district ignited outcry, announcing it had implemented a facial recognition system.

Lockport received state grant money for school safety after the shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in 2012. It decided to use about $1.4 million on facial recognition software from a company called Aegis. Lockport officials say they don’t know if they are first to use the technology, but say they are among the most open about their policies surrounding it.

Robert LiPuma: The two people that walked by were identified 100% of the time

(video shows technology director pointing to facial recognition software)

Joce: That’s the school’s technology director Dr. Robert LiPuma, showing us how it works.

LiPuma: We own everything, we protect everything, we control everything.

Joce: Cameras watch the halls. Facial recognition software is constantly scanning for only the specific faces entered into the system: sex offenders, suspended teachers, or specific individuals identified by law enforcement. When the software detects a match with one of the faces in the database, it alerts a control room, which is staffed full time and that staff member decides what to do next: ignore, alert authorities, or take other action.

Michelle Bradley: Student safety is our priority.

Joce: That’s Lockport superintendent, Michelle Bradley. She and LiPuma say the facial recognition technology does not track or record students.

In fact, due to privacy concerns that were raised by the community, the district had to implement a rule that prohibited students from being included in the system.

Joce Sterman: People automatically say you’re tracking students, but students are not even included in your database.

Continue Reading / Video / Activist Post >>>


Sharing is caring!