The Depravity of the False Flag
The Depravity of the False Flag by Michael Ballanger for The AU Report
“Never let a good crisis go to waste.” —Sir Winston Churchill
My late older brother Donnie was a quasi-anarchist tax collector for the Canadian government who self-educated himself and then morphed from a grumbling, cynical security guard/starving artist to a very successful 20-year career auditor with the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) before his untimely passing in 2014. Within weeks of the 9/11 terrorist acts that brought down the Twin Towers in New York City in 2001, he summoned me for a beer conference at the local suds parlor in the West End of Toronto. Holding court for around an hour and a half and three pitchers of local stout, he set about to convince me that all those aircraft slamming into major American landmarks of symbolic importance could only have been a “false flag” operation that was the design and execution of the American government.
His cynicism could be aggravating at times, but it was never, ever without argumentative substance. It was only until after the second Gulf War and subsequent confiscation of Iraqi oil fields, and the almost twenty-year “War Against Terror,” that evidence has come to light that in retrospect makes Donnie look somewhat clairvoyant.
Saudi terrorists carrying out multiple terrorist missions invoking massive retaliation against Iraq and Afghanistan might appear somewhat “misdirected,” but that is a discussion for the beer tent and not today’s microphobic maelstrom. The point is that all one sees may not be what it appears to be, and with markets melting down in a conflagration of fund redemption and debt liquidation, it is important to ask whether or not the arrival of a viral pandemic was the actual source of the financial implosion.
Could it not have been something else?
If one turns the pages in the Book of Bond Insolvency back to last September, every single release from the U.S. Department of Commerce was upbeat; everything coming from the Fed was positive; and stocks around the world were shrugging off the Trump Trade War, the woes of Deutsch Bank, the ever-ballooning U.S. deficit, and the extreme overvaluation (by all measures) of the global markets. In what I penned as “the greatest fiscal policy about-face in history,” I asked in October 2019 “what exactly it was that Jerome Powell saw that spooked him into a sudden series of multibillion- (then trillion) dollar liquidity injections?”
We now know that these “liquidity problems” originated, once again, in the C-Suites of the Wall Street banks, because we know now from statements from JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon that banks were having a few “issues” lending to one another. A booming economy with stocks at record levels and a president firing off numerous self-congratulatory tweets with deal flow booming and the banks are having “issues” lending to one another?
As followers of this missive know all too well, I am a full-on cynic of the highest order and not without justification. My lifelong hero of history, Sir Winston Churchill, underscored peak cynicism by offering the quote “Never let a good crisis go to waste,” in reference to taking of advantage of voter anxiety in order to advance a silent agenda or “false flag.” The actions of the Fed last fall were baffling to me, and as REPO ops began to balloon in the final days of January, it was the bond market’s crashing yields that I addressed in my February e-mail alert, not some Asian flu, that accelerated my shorting campaign that was looking really quite foolish until late February.
So, when I look at the slag heap of failed dreams and faulty assumption lying in ruin and despair on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange, I am today asking whether it was really the COVID-19 outbreak that caused the meltdown or is it the cover story that now allows the banco-political alliance to plead in the bended-knee style of Hank Paulson back in 2008 for a legislated bailout of the global banking system, not to combat the global pandemic of viral infection but the more insidious global pandemic of debt, as in “way too much of it.”
Now, with people dying and people close to my place of residence infected, I am not suggesting that this tragic outbreak is to be understated or dismissed. What I am raising is the manner in which the media and the governments around the globe have handled this crisis. Secretary Mnuchin’s first statement pledging action by the Trump Administration was “to support the U.S. economy,” with nary a mention of the health of its citizens. It would seem to me that you help the ill first, the unemployed second and the profit and loss statements of your Wall Street pals last.
Further, just as the banker-politico alliance opted to bail out the banks rather than the citizens losing their homes in 2008, it seems that history is once again rhyming, but not pleasantly nor with the numbing calm of a Robert Frost soliloquy.
After a week of total and complete market mayhem and monetary madness from the banco-politico alliance, I feel the same today as I did in 1987, 2001, 2009 and December 2018. Most importantly, I feel the same way I did in April 2011, when the central banking interventionists took down the gold and silver market in what is still, to date, the singular most blatant example of “free market” abuse ever.
That feeling is one of violation, but the odd part about it this time is that we, in the precious metals fraternity/sorority, have had to live through financial armageddons before, such that our emotional coping mechanisms are more conditioned to external violation than the current generation of stock junkies that have been day-trading the “Spoos” with “the Fed at their back” for over twelve years. Only now are they discovering the horror of financial loss at the hands of an external perpetrator. Only, for them, it is a microbe, while for us it was, and is, an entity. Nemesis arrives in different disguises.
Navigating the current investment landscape is not unlike “shooting the rapids” in a kayak, and the important tip in doing so is to keep the paddle perfectly balanced in order to keep the upper body out of the water. In terms of trading, I take position sizes down and try to avoid leverage where possible, but I go into a trade or a theme knowing full well that these are not normal times.
The performance of the gold miner exchange-traded funds (ETFs) run by Van Eck has been a disgrace, with massive swings in discount-to-net-asset-value (NAV) settlement prices and shoddy rebalancing. I must assume that I could lose everything if my judgment is off by as much as a blink, so while prudence is of the utmost importance, paralysisis not.
At the top of most advances there usually occurs a divergence, whereby stocks advance and volatility advances—a most unusual condition. At bottoms, there occurs an opposite divergence, and we are getting just that. Much as I detest the term “green shoots,” the first of them are beginning to poke their heads above the receding snow cap with the action in the SPX/VIX relationship. The chart below shows a definite divergence between stocks and volatility, and that has always been the first signal that a turn is possible.