OP-ED: If Ecuador Withdraws Support And Protection From Julian Assange, It Will Be A Tragedy

image/youtube screen grab - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nB9u9dSQVkc

OP-ED: If Ecuador Withdraws Support And Protection From Julian Assange, It Will Be A Tragedy by Elizabeth Vos – DisObedient Media

If the government of Ecuador withdraws its protection of Julian Assange by its continued jamming of his internet and phone access or through the ending of his asylum in the Ecuadorian embassy in London, it will not only harm the life of Julian Assange. It will have an impact on journalism of global proportions.

Julian Assange has always stood up for those who are attacked by overt and covert actions of government, the military industrial apparatus and the lies of the corporate press. From standing up to Twitter’s persecution of activists like Lauri Love, to exposing the war crimes of an entire nation-state apparatus via the publication of the Iraq War Logs and Collateral Murder, Julian Assange has consistently acted to protect the powerless from persecution.

Earlier today, News.com.au revealed that Assange’s internet access has not simply been cut, but is being actively, physically jammed by hand-held devices used by embassy staff. All this, against a citizen of Ecuador. Wikileaks and others have noted that this repression of Assange’s ability to speak out is contrary to the constitution of Ecuador. That this breach represents a transgression against Assange’s human rights is not in question.

The impact that his ongoing detention and isolation will have on the rest of the planet has not been sufficiently discussed by any media outlet thus far. A brilliant comment left in response to a previous Disobedient Media article reminded me of a Mr. Fish cartoon published in Harpers in 2011 (Harpers has since conveniently removed the image from its site – the cartoon was retrieved with the help of archive services.): The image reads: “WANTED. For peddling pornography of naked emperors banging the absolute hell out of Lady Justice.”

Though the days of faux-left-wing media’s praise of Assange and Wikileaks are long gone, Assange’s support for the public’s right to know, for transparency, and his efforts to shine a light on the corruption behind closed doors of governments have never wavered. As the list of powerful enemies of WikiLeaks has grown lengthy, the crowd of mainstream journalists willing to speak out on behalf of Julian Assange has become shorter by the year. This is in part thanks to the “whole-of-government” attempts to destroy WikiLeaks, both overtly and covertly, through tangible attacks and attacks on the character of WikiLeaks’ Editor-In-Chief.

For that reason, Ecuador’s support for Assange is more critical now than it has ever been. At the beginning of Julian’s stay in the embassy, he was visited by many well-known public figures who would stand for his life to be protected. That group has sadly been shortened, both through the propagation of false media narratives about him and by unfortunate, untimely deaths.

If Assange continues to be isolated from the outside world, or in the worst-case scenario loses asylum at the Ecuadorian embassy in London, the loss to investigative journalism will impact the entire planet. Corrupt politicians, warmongers, technocrats and intelligence agencies will breathe a loud sigh of relief. The light that WikiLeaks shines on the corrupt plutocracy will be irrevocably dimmed. Powers and interests behind the architecture of global war will operate in secret without fear of exposure.

Continue Reading / DisObedient Media>>>

Sharing is caring!

Disobedient Media

link to contact page - https://disobedientmedia.com/contact/ Successful investigative journalism relies on the ability to adapt to a fast changing media landscape. Twenty years ago the public had limited choices when it came to where they received their news. Today there are nearly unlimited sources of information to choose from. Primary sources of information are readily available to the public yet many are content with conjecture and hearsay from political pundits and anonymous sources. We think it's changing. The public is starting to consistently question the legacy media narrative thanks to brave independent journalists, whistleblowers, and independent publishers who have risked it all to reveal the truth. Our belief is that the truth has no bias.