Tide Turns Against Radical Left
Tide Turns Against Radical Left – Foul-Mouth MAGA Hat Snatcher May Face Felony Charges, Trump Affirms Religious Liberty, FBI Warns Of Black Extremists Groups by Susan Duclos – All News Pipeline
A number of recent seemingly unrelated events have come to my attention which shows that the tide is turning against radical leftists across America that for too long have been allowed to violate the rights of others.
EXAMPLE #1 – FOUL-MOUTHED MAGA HAT SNATCHER MAY FACE FEMONY ROBBERY CHARGES
As many might remember ANP recently reported on a foul-mouthed college snowflake at University of California, Edith Macias, who ripped a Make America Great Again hat off of another student, Matthew Vitale’s head, then proceeded to rant and rave at him and school workers about how offended she was in a curse-filled tirade over his right to wear the hat.
Originally Mr. Vitale was going to just let it go, but then he was told by campus police that her actions, with the video as proof of those actions, show she violated California law, specifically California’s robbery laws: Penal Code 211 PC, defines the crime of robbery as taking personal property from someone else’s person or immediate presence, against the victim’s will, through the use of force or fear. PC 211 robbery is always a felony in California law. Penalties range from probation to five years in prison.
Vitale has stated he does intend to press charges, maintaining that he is not doing so out of revenge, but because “behavior like this is not tolerated in this country.”
He also highlights his belief that “if she had been wearing a Malcom X cap or a pro-abortion cap, and I had snatched it off her head and ran down to student life and turned her in and demanded that she be kept from wearing that hat, I very firmly believe that I would be sitting in jail right now.”
This is good news on two fronts: 1) The fact that a campus police officer was the one to inform Vitale that Macias’ actions were against California law, tells us that college police are sick and tired of seeing this type of behavior go unpunished, and; 2) Conservatives, on and off college campuses, have ‘turned the other cheek’ too often and incidents like the one shown below, continue to increase in frequency, so actually holding this woman accountable by pressing charges, is a statement in and of itself that conservatives are done with standing down and are prepared to fight back… legally.
For those that didn’t see the viral video, see below – LANGUAGE WARNING:
EXAMPLE #2 – COLLEGE APPROVES ‘PROTEST PUNISHMENT’ POLICY
For years now we have seen everything from outright rioting and physical attacks against conservative speakers accepting invitations to speak at college events across the nation, with schools barely giving the offenders a slap on the wrist for their destruction, allowing this behavior to continue without anyone being held accountable for their actions.
While peaceful protests are part of our very rights as Americans, violent protests and rioting is not and never has been a right guaranteed under the U.S. constitution, which is why seeing the University of Wisconsin System leaders approving a policy on Fridaythat would see students that disrupt campus speeches and presentations, suspended and/or expelled from the University.
The Board of Regents adopted the language on a voice vote during a meeting at the University of Wisconsin-Stout in Menomonie. The policy states that students found to have twice engaged in violence or other disorderly conduct that disrupts others’ free speech would be suspended. Students found to have disrupted others’ free expression three times would be expelled.
I am not sure why someone would have to engage in violence or disorderly conduct twice before being suspended, one time should be enough, but it is a start and a sign that after so many public spectacles have been made across the country by snowflakes that cannot handle the fact that someone is on campus offering a view or opinion that doesn’t match their own, some schools are starting to crack down on that type of behavior. Kudos to UW!
Democratic opponents to this policy once again are attempting to conflate legitimate peaceful protesters with violent thugs, by claiming “This policy will chill and suppress free speech on this campus and all campuses,” with another Democratic politician asking “Who’s going to show up to a protest if they think they could be potentially expelled?”
Perfect examples of intellectual dishonesty.
As to the first assertion: The violent, black clad, masked little thugs attacking peaceful protesters are the ones “chilling and suppressing” free speech, this policy will help guarantee those constitutional rights are no longer trampled on. To the second guy’s question, “peaceful protesters” are the ones that will show up because they don’t disrupt the presentations of other speakers, so they know they won’t be “potentially expelled.”
EXAMPLE #3 – TRUMP AFFIRMS RELIGIOUS LIBERTY, ABORTIONS INDUSTRY GOES NUTS
One of the most offensive and egregious parts of Obamacare was the employer mandate that forced employers to provide coverage to workers that included birth control and abortifacients, even if it went against their religious beliefs. It was a highly controversial aspect of the bill, explained well by National Review back in 2015: