Wasserman Schultz to be Indicted but the Indictment is a Clinton Cover-Up
Wasserman Schultz to be Indicted but the Indictment is a Clinton Cover-Up by Dave Hodges – The Common Sense Show
The following story is factual. The intentions, of certain DOJ officials are honorable. The sources confirming what is about to be presented are reliable. Some of the sources are public, some of the sources are confidential. There are three other media people involved other than myself in the following revelations. One Congressman, possibly two have/will be revealing damning information on the following topic.
Allegation: Debbie Wasserman Schultz Will Be Indicted for Revealing State Secrets to Foreign Intelligence Agents (Awans’)
The headline is factual and it is correct; Debbie Wasserman Schultz will be indicted for the previously mentioned crime through leaks obtained by the Awans’ coming from Wasserman Schultz’s laptop. In reality, she should be indicted for treason against the People of the United States.
In an interview with Rep. Trent Franks (R-AZ), revealed on Lou Dobbs, strongly suggested that there will soon be news about Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-FL) and the prospect of a “state’s evidence deal” made by federal prosecutors and extended to Hina Alvi, a Pakistan national who is wanted in questioning in federal bank fraud charges against husband Imran Awan, is in process.
Franks went on to say that, “I think you’re going to see some revelations that are pretty profound. And the fact that this wife is coming back from Pakistan and is willing to face charges, as it were, I think there’s a good chance that she’s going to receive some sort of immunity to tell a larger story that is going to be pretty disturbing to the American people.” Franks would not be more specific in his allegations.
For months, both myself and my Independent Media colleagues have reported that Wasserman Schultz and the now-indicted Awan, who was arrested at a Washington airport, trying flee justice before flying to Pakistan, now stands indicted.
I previously reported that the two co-conspirators concealed evidence linked to the hack of the Democratic National Committee computer system in 2016. Both Darin Damme, talk show host on KTAR Radio (92.3 FM), myself and as well as Doug Hagmann revealed that the DNC NEVER allowed the FBI to examine the laptop evidence. However, that did not stop former FBI Director, James Comey, from starting the ball rolling in claiming that the DNC tapes proved Russian collusion between Trump and the Russians in order to interfere in the election. Comey lied and he should be indicted for obstruction of justice.
HOW COULD COMEY MAKE THE CLAIM OF RUSSIAN COLLUSION WITH TRUMP WHEN THE FBI NEVER EXAMINED THE DNC SERVER?
What Doug Hagmann and I have independently discovered is that the hack (initiated by Seth Rich and turned over to Wikileaks) revealed higly embarrassing and illegal emails that linked members of the media to personalities in Hillary Clinton’s political organization and the DNC. Further, there were emails demonstrated that Wasserman Schultz colluded with Clinton and Podesta to steal the Democratic Primary Election from Bernie Sanders.
Wasserman Schultz resigned from the DNC in the middle of the Primary in order that Clinton might distance herself from the voter fraud in which she and John Podesta were clearly the central figures. Despite the distancing, this added to the public’s mistrust of Clinton’s campaign’s integrity and added fuel to Trump’s campaign. Without question, from my perspective, the leak of the emails to Wikileaks, not the Russians, is linked to the murder of the leaker of the DNC emails, Seth Rich. Clinton’s campaign manager, John Podesta, upon learning about the leak of the emails, said “Let’s make the leaker pay”. The Democrats did make the leaker pay. Seth Rich was murdered and the investigation was derailed by Wasserman Schultz’s brother, Steve Wasserman a federal prosecutor in Washington DC.
In an amazing conflict of interest, Steve Wasserman a Federal Deistrict Attorney for DC has shut down the Seth Rich murder investigation.
The Purpose of the Fictional Russian Narrative
The DNC has persisted in clinging to their false narrative that the hack was accomplished from outside the DNC by Russians in an unknown remote location.
However, the clear evidence, that I have previously reported on, clearly shows that the stolen emails were released by an insider with direct access to DNC servers. That would be Seth Rich and this was acknowledged in a previous article on The Common Sense Show.
In addition, the DNC has continued to keep the FBI from getting access to their servers after the alleged cyber-attacks. This fact brings this conspiracy full circle back to Awan who is an IT specialist who worked for the DNC and more than a dozen Democrats in the House of Representatives, including Wasserman Schultz. Awan and four of his associates, including his wife, are now facing charges of bank fraud, a procurement scam, and violating House IT network rules, that are wholly unrelated to the email hack.
Eventually, Awan was fired by all the other Democrats who used his IT service, many of whom are on the House Intelligence Committee. This is significant because my confidential sources tell me that Awan and his family were working for Pakistani Intelligence and through Wasserman Schultz’s computer were able to learn of America’s intentions toward China. In other words, Pakistani intelligence passed along the Awan-procured intelligence to China.
Wasserman Schultz freaked out and went ballistic on Capital Police when they took her laptop that was “left out” in the open by Awan, allegedly. Doug Hagmann stated in an Interview on September 10, 2017, that the laptop was planted, not by Awan, but by an insider friendly to Trump.
The relevant material is revealed by Hagmann about halfway through the following interview.
Wasserman Schultz Tries to Erase Her Connection to DNC Voter Fraud
Despite the fact that the Awan brothers had been outed by the rest of Congress as bad news, that did not stop Wasserman Schultz from continuing to employ the Awans until July. Federal authorities are investigating if classified information was compromised by the Awan family.
“Awan’s attorney said this summer that his client had no “classified clearance for anything.” A further connection between Awan and Wasserman Schultz arose when on April 6, 2017, when U.S. Capitol Police discovered a laptop issued to her. That laptop and an accompanying letter were found during the predawn hours in a room that once served as a phone booth in the Rayburn House Office Building, according to a Capitol Police report according to The Daily Caller.: This is the plant of the laptop by a source friendly to Trump that Hagmann is referring to in the above interview. The room where the laptop was secured is on the second floor of the Rayburn Building, not in the Longworth House Office Building where Wasserman Schultz has her office.
Along with the laptop were copies of Awan’s driver’s license and Congressional ID badge, a Pakistani ID card, and letters to the U.S. Attorney. In an accompanying notebook, U.S. Capitol Police also found notes marked “attorney-client privilege.” This was all a bit too convenient and clearly points to the fact that Wasserman Schultz was outed. The laptop had the username “RepDWS,” even though the Wasserman Schultz had previously said that she had never seen it and that it belonged to Awan in the worn out mantra “the drugs aren’t mine”.
“During a May 18, 2017 Congressional hearing on the U.S. Capitol Police budget, Wasserman Schultz appeared to threaten Capitol Police Chief Matthew Verderosa with “consequences” if he would not return the laptop in question. She told Verderosa, “If a Member [of Congress] loses equipment,” it should be given back. When Verderosa told her the laptop is tied to a criminal suspect and thus cannot be returned, Wasserman Schultz reiterated that the computer should be returned because it is “a member’s … if the member is not under investigation.” Well now she is under investigation.
I was given information by an inside source and later a colleague of the inside anonymous source. I am constrained from revealing everything I know because it would burn the secondary source. If the reader is wondering why this information would be revealed to me in the first place, one has to realize the purpose of confidential informants. I was given the information so I would know what to look for in my investigation. This is the exact same pattern I utilized when I revealed the potential military coup against Obama as the co-conspirators were attempting to rescue Ambassador Stevens.
My findings, resulting from the confidential informants, have been validated, in part by Darin Damme and Congressman Trent Franks’ statements about the impending legal difficulties for Wasserman Schultz.
Video of the Trent Franks Interview with Lou Dobbs
I am restrained from calling this section of the article “the conclusion”, because at this point, there is no conclusion.
Here is where I speculate where this is going. Wasserman Schultz should be indicted for working with Pakistani Intelligence (the Awan family). However, the fix is in. She is going down for a lesser inclued charge of revealing state secrets through her sloppy handling of the Awan-possessed laptop. This charge will satisfy the public that justice was done. And this charge protects the DNC’s voter fraud scam (remember, the DNC is still being sued by Sanders’ supporters). This charge also will prevent Wasserman Schultz from implicating either Podesta and/or Clinton in the voter fraud and the murder of Seth Rich. Hillary Clinton stands at the intersection of corrupt government and the secret government that we call the Deep State. Clinton can never be allowed to stand trial. Therefore, I would suspect, in exchange for her life, Wasserman Schultz will do a short prison term and the sacred cows of the Deep State can rest easy. This is how Anthony Weiner was dealt with, Prison in exchange for his life.
As far as the Awan situation and the Pakistani intelligence connection to China, I am pursuing this story and it is getting legs. I will be reporting on this in a future article, and yes, I have distributed my findings to date to trusted sources and will not make the mistake that Breitbart made..