Eight Trump Cards in 2017
Eight Trump Cards in 2017
It’s official. The annual pre-order page for the “World In ….” issue of The Economist magazine is available (linked here). The Economist magazine is, of course, that freely acknowledged printed-page mouthpiece of the Rothschild Empire. Lest anyone care to debate that statement, may I direct your attention to their own words as published on The Economist’s official Wikipedia page (linked here). This is a magazine that speaks from the heart of the City of London and thence, we can assume, from the Knights Templar themselves, with all its Kabbalistic and Rosicrucian heritage.
The publication belongs to the Economist Group. It is 50% owned by the English branch of the Rothschild family and by the Agnelli family through its holding company Exor. The remaining 50% is held by private investors including the editors and staff. The Rothschilds and the Agnellis are represented on the board of directors. A board of trustees formally appoints the editor, who cannot be removed without its permission. Although The Economist has a global emphasis and scope, about two-thirds of the 75 staff journalists are based in the City of Westminster, London.
My blog today is not going to even try to interpret Rothschild’s message via these eight cards. However, I’ll post a YouTube link to our official Clif High Apologist, jsnip4, down below. He offered a nice summary of one person’s interpretation. What I do want to do with this blog is provide a bit of education and history on just what is Tarotology. In no way, shape, or form do I encourage anybody to get wrapped up in that mysticism. But it is important for us to acknowledge that the global financial debt-based money system continues to dominate us under the auspices of a very dark, ancient language of occult symbols and arcane energies. The Rothschilds have now come fully out of the closet on that point.
From even a cursory review of various Wikipedia links, we can learn that there are several versions of Tarot card decks with varying background designs. However, the title character on each card is generally the same from version to version. The deck generally consists of a total of 78 cards. 56 of those cards are described as the “minor arcana.” By the way, our standard 52-card deck of playing cards is somewhat modeled after this “minor” set of tarot cards but minus the more obvious occult symbology. (Nevertheless, I still cast a suspicious eye on that Jack whose father has a sword piercing his skull. But I digress.)
The set of cards that always draws the most attention from the pro-conspiracy crowd are those top-level 22 trump cards — and yes they are called TRUMP cards — that part of the tarot deck customarily labeled as the “major arcana.” Besides being entitled by a character or object name, those cards are also numbered beginning with the Joker as Zero, followed by various characters 1-21. (For those of you who have followed my “Bee In Eden” radio shows, there goes that “Mystical Zero” thing again, the Nothing that is the beginning of creation). This YouTube broadcaster posted one follower’s conclusions on what The Economist artwork may be telling us:
TOWER = 16
JUDGMENT = 20
WORLD = 21
HERMIT = 9
DEATH = 13
MAGICIAN = 1
WHEEL OF FORTUNE = 10
STAR = 17
It should also be noted that while the character titles that appear on a tarot card seem fairly uniform amongst various versions of tarot, the graphical designs of the cards can vary wildly and have long been a collectible fetish for many people. For example, the “Tower” card shown here in The Economist is a very distinct version from the one many of us have seen, that is, the one of a tower on fire with people jumping out of windows (a la 9/11). Already you can see that this tarot set on the magazine cover depicts a caricature of PEOTUS Donald J. Trump seated on the “Judgment” card. So, obviously, tarot card manufacturers have already created such a version, or possibly The Economist artist photo-shopped Trump’s caricature onto some other tarot version.
To RM readers here who would like to do the research, if you can find a brand of this particular set of tarot pictures, please post them in the Comments below and tweet me with that info@BanksterSlayer. I am curious to find out exactly which brand of cards did The Economist choose to use. That alone might reveal something about the message.
CLICK ON THE PICTURE TO VIEW OR DOWNLOAD A LARGER VERSION. Who are the 14 faces deeply embedded within the “Star” card? To me, they appear to (victimized?) children or adolescents. Or are these something like “yearbook photos” of people who are now adults and are now sitting in positions of power? And what does the “comet” in the middle of the card represent? Is this whole card a reference to the shocking #PizzaGate horror that involves Comet Ping Pong Pizza underground pedophilia ring? Please leave comments below with your observations and/or reputable web page exposure.
ALL ROADS LEAD TO KABBALAH
I may actually be forced to offer a bit of thanks to the Rothschilds for ordering this artwork to depict their world view of 2017. The artwork provides a nice segue into a topic that I plan to spend much time writing about next year, the Kabbalah.
The knee-jerk definition of Kabbalah is usually stated as “Jewish mysticism.” While that is largely true, the Kabbalah functions more like a “blueprint” or a “formula” that one can use to create many systems of belief. One expert, David Livingstone of web site ConspiracySchool.com, describes ideologies like Hermeticism, Gnosticism, Rationalism, Atheism, and Transhumanism as offshoots of the main root, which is the Kabbalah. Why, it’s as if one can use Kabbalah principles to “mother” other dialectics into existence.
As further evidence to support my never-ending mantra that our banking system was established firmly on a foundation of Babylonian mysticism and deserves complete destruction, I will copy the comments posted within the Tarotology page at Wikipedia that connect the dots between these cards and that ancient language of symbols that seems to keep popping up over and over again.