by Daniel Barker
The globalists are worried. They think Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton stands a real chance of losing to Republican nominee Donald J. Trump. That’s why they’re pulling out all the stops and doing anything they can, short of physically harming the GOP nominee (so far), to try and stop him.
As a series of WikiLeaks dumps have proven, there is so much collusion between the Clinton campaign, the mainstream media and the Obama White House, and all with the singular goal of defeating the man who they believe will upset the global order and, of course, their stranglehold on power.
Just how worried are these globalists? You can answer that with another question: When was the last time you heard a top United Nations official call an American presidential candidate a “global threat,” while calling for his defeat?
You can tell the globalists fear Trump by the ferocity with which they attack him
The fact is, the globalist left will always tell you who they fear the most. You’ll know by the vigor of their attacks, and Trump is being assaulted – factually and falsely – with unprecedented ferocity, and by all elements of the global power base.
One of the primary tactics these globalist masters are using to sway the American public is fear. They want you to be so scared of a Donald Trump presidency that you’ll run, not walk, to your polling station to cast a ballot for Clinton.
But this is absolutely laughable in the face of hard, documented evidence. For instance, the world is closer now to a nuclear World War III than at any time since the “Operation Able Archer” nuclear war scare in 1983. Even now, Mr. “I’ll Get Us Out of War” is weighing new military options for Syria – a country whose internal conflict has little real bearing on our own national security (remember, Obama says ISIS isn’t a threat and that we can safely vet any Syrian refugees coming from that part of the world – right?). If anyone is current a “threat to global stability,” it’s Obama and his former secretary of state. Both of them have so badly mismanaged Syria and the entire Middle East that the region is on fire nearly everywhere.
In addition, Obama has pursued globalist economic policies that Hillary Clinton has also pledged to continue. That includes the Trans-Pacific Partnership (opposed by Trump) that will further enrich the globalist elite while continuing to outsource American jobs and opportunities. Under Obama, the wealthiest have grown more wealthy while the Middle Class has shrunk even further, as billionaire businessman and investor Nick Hanauer explains in this heavily censored TED talk.
Trump’s fingerprints are not on any of the global crises and messes created by the globalists
And Clinton, as this white paper by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, and the editors of NewsTarget.com point out so thoroughly, is the candidate in this presidential race that is wholly owned and co-opted by Monsanto, Big Pharma, Big Food and the establishment medical industry. Not Trump, who is funding his campaign partly with his own money and partly with donations from average Americans who support him.
So you see, there’s no question as to what this election is really all about: It’s about taking our country back from the Monsanto’s, the Big Pharma’s, the vaccine authoritarians, the poison GMO food pushers and the major money players like George Soros, Warren Buffett and others who use their wealth to further enhance their portfolios while buying access and driving national and global policies.
Clinton, without question, will give us more of Washington’s “deals,” more government agency corruption, more globalist trade that harms American jobs, more big corporate influence over our lives, more wars that we don’t need to fight and less health freedom. Her record, and that of her former boss, make crystal clear the fact that they are the threat to global stability, not Trump – who has no fingerprints on any of it.